Tuesday, December 05, 2006

SKorean robot will walk the walk as well as talk the talk

"We are now working to improve the motion and upgrade intelligence so that next-generation androids can walk like a human, engage in more sophisticated conversations and have a wider range of facial expressions."

(Via Betterhumans.)


So far androids have failed to achieve anthropomorphic escape velocity; they've remained the stuff of technology conventions and speculative prototypes. But it's not unreasonable or difficult to imagine them truly "walking among us" in the near future, probably in a subservient context.

It's tempting to presume their human veneer will fail to keep us from treating them as anything but selfless machines . . . but, then again, don't we treat machines with a certain reverence (including but by no means limited to cars and video game consoles)?

If androids -- be they supermarket cashiers, waiters, receptionists or even sex-workers -- are sufficiently practical, I think it's likely we'll bestow upon them a pragmatic sort of dignity.

But then there's Moore's Law to deal with. Regardless of whether we achieve strong AI -- of even if self-aware machines are possible (a bone of contention among Posthuman Blues readers) -- androids will likely become just smart enough to become threatening, and our relationship with them will change accordingly. And if they do become "Turing compliant," we can expect a massive sociological rift we'd be wise to observe in detail -- because androids, regardless of their intended utility, will provide us with our first glimpse of what it's like to live in a world where intelligence isn't exclusive to humans.

One way or another, we'd better learn to get used to it.

2 comments:

W.M. Bear said...

Mac -- My contention is not that androids are not going to become "self aware" any time soon but that they are not even going to approach what most of us would consider a human level of intelligence any time soon. I would further predict that even if quantum computers are developed with many, many times the processing power of the human brain (a not unlikely prospect), strong AI is STILL something that is not likely to be seen in our lifetimes. And again, this failure will be a consequence of the far more fundamental failure to draw any meaningful distinctions between mind and brain on the part both of people studying brain function and those attempting to achieve "strong AI" based on those studies. Within the current materialistic mind-set of science, ain't gonna happen.

W.M. Bear said...

And, BTW, I also consider the whole android-facial-expression fad(given its current cachet by the MIT Media Lab) to be totally bogus. Facial expressions are no substitute for true intelligence, now are they? (Wait! What am I saying! Haven't I hung around corporations enough to know that facial expressions ARE a substitute for intelligence! What was I thinking?)